Brashear v. USA

Brashear v. USA

Petitioner:	Kyle Wayne Brashear
Respondent:	USA
Case Number:	1:2014cv00176
Filed:	December 5, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	Cape Girardeau Office
County:	New Madrid
Presiding Judge:	Audrey G. Fleissig
Nature of Suit:	Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 1, 2015	Filing 10 MEMORANDUM: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, to the extent Petitioner is requesting additional time or relief, that request is DENIED. (Doc. No. 9) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall send a copy of the Court's Memorandum and Order and Judgment filed on March 24, 2015 (Doc. Nos. 6 and 7) to Petitioner at the address recently provided to the Court. The Clerk of Courtshall also serve a copy of this Order on Petitioner at the same address. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 4/1/2015. (JMC)
March 24, 2015	Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Kyle Brashear's motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence is DENIED. (Doc. No. 1.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court will not issue a Ce rtificate of Appealability as Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 3/24/2015. (JMC)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 1, 2015

Filing 10 MEMORANDUM: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, to the extent Petitioner is requesting additional time or relief, that request is DENIED. (Doc. No. 9) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall send a copy of the Court's Memorandum and Order and Judgment filed on March 24, 2015 (Doc. Nos. 6 and 7) to Petitioner at the address recently provided to the Court. The Clerk of Courtshall also serve a copy of this Order on Petitioner at the same address. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 4/1/2015. (JMC)

March 24, 2015

Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Kyle Brashear's motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence is DENIED. (Doc. No. 1.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court will not issue a Ce rtificate of Appealability as Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). A separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 3/24/2015. (JMC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brashear v. USA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Represented By:	Timothy J. Willis(Designation Assistant US Attorney)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Kyle Wayne Brashear
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?