Johnson v. Pemiscot County Jail
Plaintiff: Kendrix Johnson
Defendant: Thomas Greenwell
Case Number: 1:2015cv00038
Filed: March 9, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: Cape Girardeau Office
County: Pemiscot
Presiding Judge: Abbie Crites-Leoni
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's supplement filed March 23, 2015, shall be construed as a motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 3] and is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial fi ling fee of $1.00 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to Clerk, United States District Court, and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall terminate Pemiscot County Jail as the party defendant and replace it with Thomas D. Greenwell, Pemiscot County Sheriff. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall serve process on Thomas D. Greenwell. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, upon receipt of service, Greenwell is directed to review plaintiffs medical files and identify the names of the nurses and doctors who have had contact with plaintiff during his detention there. Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 4/23/2015. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 3/24/15. (MRS)
March 18, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint form.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Courts Motion to Proceed In F orma Pauperis B Prisoner Cases form.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on the Court-provided form within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is advised that his amended complaint will take the place of his original complaint and will be the only pleading that this Court will review.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall either pay the $400 filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. If the case is dismissed for non-compliance with this Order, the dismissal will not constitute a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(g).Response to Court due by 4/17/2015. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 3/18/15. (MRS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Johnson v. Pemiscot County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kendrix Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas Greenwell
Represented By: A. M. Spradling, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?