Regions Bank v. The Fausz Group Co. et al
| Regions Bank |
| The Fausz Group Co. and ARay, Inc. |
| 1:2017cv00027 |
| February 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Cape Girardeau Office |
| Within US but Outside District |
| Abbie Crites-Leoni |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 1819 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion to Set Aside Clerk's Entry of Default and for Leave to File Answer out of Time (Doc. 20) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Appointment of a Receiver (Doc. 12) is GRANTED. A receiver will be appointed by separate Order. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 5/12/2017. (JMC)
|
|
Filing
4
CLERK'S ORDER (GJL) - The above styled and numbered case was filed on February 8, 2017 and assigned to the Eastern Division. After a review of the case, it was determined that the case was assigned incorrectly. The case should have been assigned to the Southeastern Division. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the above styled case is transferred to the Southeastern Division and randomly assigned to the Honorable Abbie Crites-Leoni, United States Magistrate Judge under cause number 1:17cv27. It is hereby Ordered that cause number 4:17cv497 CAS be administratively closed.(BAK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
