Daniel v. Darter et al
Plaintiff: Kevin Dewayne Daniel
Defendant: Nick Darter and Jeff McCormick
Case Number: 1:2017cv00168
Filed: September 25, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: Cape Girardeau Office
County: Dunklin
Presiding Judge: Noelle C. Collins
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to reopen his case is GRANTED. [ECF No. 7] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). An Order of D~ssal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Case reopened. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 5/2/2019. (JMC)
September 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff must pay an initial filing fee of $1.00 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Ord er. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittancepayable to "Clerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an origina l proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all proceedings in this case are STAYED pending final disposition of the appellate proceedings and post-conviction proceedings against plaintiffrelating to his criminal case of See State v. Daniel, Case No. C ase No.l 7DU-CR00948-01 (35th Judicial Circuit, Dunklin County Court). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall notify the Court in writing concerning the final disposition of the criminal charges pending against him in See State v. Daniel, Case No . l 7DU-CR00948-01 (35th Judicial Circuit, Dunklin County Court). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSEDpending final disposition of the appellate proceedings and post-conviction proceedings related to the criminal charges pe nding against plaintiff in See State v. Daniel, Case No. Case No. l 7DU-CR00948-01 (35th Judicial Circuit, Dunklin County Court). This case may be reopened by plaintiffs filing of a motion to reopen the case after such final disposition. ( Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 10/27/2017.) Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 9/27/2017. (JMC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daniel v. Darter et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kevin Dewayne Daniel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nick Darter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeff McCormick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?