Taylor v. New Madrid County et al
| 1:2020cv00022 |
| February 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Cape Girardeau Office |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 CLERK'S ORDER (GJL) - Due to electronic case opening, the above numbered case was inadvertently opened in error. Therefore, this case will be administratively closed. The new case number in the Southeastern Division is 1:20cv22 SRC (BAK) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff Shelby Taylor Process Server: Ferrill Court Services (BAK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number AMOEDC-7728516, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Shelby Taylor. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Notice of Intent to Use Process Server, #4 Summons Summons to New Madrid County, #5 Summons Summons to Joan L. Holland)(Brody, Bryan) |
| Case Opening Notification: 2 Summons(es) issued. The summons were emailed to attorney Bryan E. Brody. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Stephen R. Clark. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Taylor v. New Madrid County et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
