Sutton v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
| Ronald Lamont Sutton |
| Joule N. Stevenson, M.D., Dir. of Nursing Dawn Wade, R. Woods, Corizon Health Inc., Anne L. Precythe and Kim Weatherford-Williams |
| 1:2020cv00160 |
| July 27, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Henry Edward Autrey |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 FINANCIAL AFFIDAVIT - CJA 23 by Plaintiff Ronald Lamont Sutton. (MRS) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Ronald Lamont Sutton. (MRS) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Ronald Lamont Sutton. (MRS) |
| Filing 1 DCM COMPLAINT against defendant Corizon Health Inc., Anne L. Precythe, Joule N. Stevenson, MD, Dawn Wade, Kim Weatherford-Williams, R. Woods Jury Demand,, filed by Ronald Lamont Sutton. (Attachments: #1 supplemental, #2 Civil Cover Sheet and Original Filing Form, #3 Envelope)(MRS) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Jul 27 13:01:22 CDT 2020 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Henry E. Autrey. (MRS) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (MRS) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
