Brown v. Saul
Plaintiff: Michael Brown
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Case Number: 1:2021cv00066
Filed: April 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Presiding Judge: Patricia L Cohen
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 21, 2021 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Michael Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Served ORC 5/13/21)(Overton, Kathleen)
May 21, 2021 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Michael Brown. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Served Atty General 5/17/21)(Overton, Kathleen)
May 21, 2021 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Michael Brown. Defendant Andrew M. Saul served on 5/13/2021, answer due 7/12/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Served US Atty 5/13/21)(Overton, Kathleen)
May 18, 2021 Filing 5 FULL CONSENT has been received by Plaintiff Michael Brown, Defendant Andrew M. Saul. Consent to Magistrate Judge, Consent to Magistrate Judge (CMH)
May 18, 2021 Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Jane Rund for Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (Rund, Jane)
April 28, 2021 Summons Issued as to defendant Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. The summons was emailed to dap@danielparmelelaw.com. (CMH)
April 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: This case is assigned to Track: 4: Social Security Appeal. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 5/18/2021. SEE JUDGMENT FOR FURTHER SCHEDULING DEADLINES. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on 4/27/21. (CSG)
April 21, 2021 Case Opening Notification: All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen. (CMH)
April 20, 2021 Filing 2 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob)
April 20, 2021 Filing 1 Social Security COMPLAINT with receipt number AMOEDC-8597850, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,Yes or No - No,, filed by Michael Brown. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons Atty General, #4 Summons OGC, #5 Summons US Atty)(Overton, Kathleen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brown v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Brown
Represented By: Kathleen E. Overton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Jane Rund
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA Office of General Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?