Hurt v. PepsiCo, Inc. d/b/a Frito-Lay, Inc.
| Michael C Hurt |
| PepsiCo, Inc. d/b/a Frito-Lay, Inc. and Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP |
| 1:2022cv00059 |
| May 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Abbie Crites-Leoni |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
RULE 16 ORDER. This case is assigned to Track: 2: Standard. Joint Scheduling Plan due by 7/28/2022. Rule 16 Conference set for 8/4/2022 11:30 AM in Telephone Conference in Chambers before Magistrate Judge Abbie Crites-Leoni. Signed by Magistrate Judge Abbie Crites-Leoni on 06/28/22. (CMH)
|
| Filing 12 FULL CONSENT has been received by Plaintiff Michael C Hurt, Defendant Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP. Consent to Magistrate Judge, Consent to Magistrate Judge (CMH) |
| Filing 11 Amended ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP.(Solverud, Erik) |
| Notice from Clerk instructing Plaintiff Michael C Hurt to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 6/29/2022. (JMC) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Plaintiff's Consent Motion to Substitute Party. For the reasons stated in the Motion, IT IS ORDERED that "Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP" is substituted for "PepsiCo, Inc. d/b/a Frito-Lay, Inc." as Defendant in this matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Abbie Crites-Leoni on 6/15/2022. (EMD)
|
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION to Substitute Party Defendant by Plaintiff Michael C Hurt. (Emmons, Jason) |
| Filing 8 ENTRY of Appearance by Timothy J. Ahrenhoersterbaeumer for Defendant PepsiCo, Inc. d/b/a Frito-Lay, Inc.. (Ahrenhoersterbaeumer, Timothy) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by PepsiCo, Inc. d/b/a Frito-Lay, Inc..(Solverud, Erik) |
| Filing 6 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: U.S. Magistrate Judge Abbie S. Crites-Leoni. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (CMH) |
| Filing 5 Complaint (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court of Stoddard County, filed by Michael C Hurt.(CMH) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant PepsiCo, Inc. d/b/a Frito-Lay, Inc. (Unexecuted) Sent To: State Court - Executed (Solverud, Erik) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant PepsiCo, Inc. d/b/a Frito-Lay, Inc.. Parent companies: None, Subsidiaries: None, Publicly held company: None,. (Solverud, Erik) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant PepsiCo, Inc. d/b/a Frito-Lay, Inc. Sent To: Plaintiff (Solverud, Erik) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Stoddard County, case number 22SD-CC00043, with receipt number AMOEDC-9269785, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by PepsiCo, Inc. d/b/a Frito-Lay, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State court File, #2 Original Filing Form Original Filing Form, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Solverud, Erik) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
