Elliott v. The Procter & Gamble U.S. Business Services Company et al
Raymond Scott Elliott |
The Procter & Gamble U.S. Business Services Company, The Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company, Heidi Burnett, James Eftink and Brandon Bader |
1:2022cv00166 |
December 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Matthew T Schelp |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendants The Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company, The Procter & Gamble U.S. Business Services Company, The Procter & Gamble Company, The Procter & Gamble Company.. (Hanslick, Jeffrey) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendants Brandon Bader, Heidi Burnett, James Eftink, The Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company, The Procter & Gamble U.S. Business Services Company Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal)(Hanslick, Jeffrey) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau, Missouri, case number 22CG-CC00164, with receipt number AMOEDC-9664355, in the amount of $402 Jury Demand,, filed by The Procter & Gamble U.S. Business Services Company, James Eftink, Heidi Burnett, The Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company, Brandon Bader. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form)(Hanslick, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.