Ramirez v. Medicredit, Inc.

Ramirez v. Medicredit, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Diane Ramirez
Defendant:	Medicredit, Inc.
Case Number:	2:2010cv00027
Filed:	April 20, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	Hannibal Office
County:	Schuyler
Presiding Judge:	Jean C. Hamilton
Nature of Suit:	Consumer Credit
Cause of Action:	15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 28, 2010	Filing 13 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all pending motions are denied without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall file within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order, a stipulation for dismissal, a motion for leave to voluntarily dismiss, or a proposed consent judgment. Failure to timely comply with this Order shall result in the dismissal of this action withprejudice. Dismissal Paper(s) due by 9/28/2010. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 7/28/10. (CLA)
April 21, 2010	Filing 3 CLERK'S ORDER (JGW) - On April 20, 2010, the above styled cause was inadvertently assigned a case number for the Eastern Division of the Eastern District of Missouri. Upon closer examination, it has been determined that the case should have been filed as a Northern Division case. Therefore, a Northern Division case number must be drawn and a judge assigned. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case has been randomly assigned to the Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, U.S. District Judge. In all future documents filed with the Court, please use the following case number: 2:10-cv-00027-JCH. (DLB)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 28, 2010

Filing 13 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all pending motions are denied without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall file within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order, a stipulation for dismissal, a motion for leave to voluntarily dismiss, or a proposed consent judgment. Failure to timely comply with this Order shall result in the dismissal of this action withprejudice. Dismissal Paper(s) due by 9/28/2010. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 7/28/10. (CLA)

April 21, 2010

Filing 3 CLERK'S ORDER (JGW) - On April 20, 2010, the above styled cause was inadvertently assigned a case number for the Eastern Division of the Eastern District of Missouri. Upon closer examination, it has been determined that the case should have been filed as a Northern Division case. Therefore, a Northern Division case number must be drawn and a judge assigned. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case has been randomly assigned to the Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, U.S. District Judge. In all future documents filed with the Court, please use the following case number: 2:10-cv-00027-JCH. (DLB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ramirez v. Medicredit, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diane Ramirez
Represented By:	Larry P. Smith
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Medicredit, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?