Guile v. United States of America
| Cleora I. Guile |
| United States of America |
| 2:2011cv00040 |
| May 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Hannibal Office |
| Adair |
| Jean C. Hamilton |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant United States of America's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 40 ) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED with prejudice. An appropriate Judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 9/25/12. (TRC)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED 26 Second MOTION to Dismiss Case and Memorandum in Support filed by United States of America is denied. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 3/14/12. (CLA)
|
|
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 10 , 12 ORDERED that Defendant United States of America's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10) is DENIED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Affidavit Out of Time (ECF No. 12) i s GRANTED, and Plaintiff is granted until Monday, November 21, 2011,within which to file the affidavit required by Mo.Rev.Stat. 538.225. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Request for Expert Services pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act (ECF No. 12) is DENIED. ( Response to Court due by 11/21/2011.). Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 9/21/11. (CEL)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted until Monday, September 26, 2011, within which to file her response to Defendants Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10). Failure to do so will result in the Courts ruling on Defendants unopposed motion. Response to Court due by 9/26/2011. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 9/6/11. (CLA)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to be issued on the amended complaint. Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 6/23/11. (CLA)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 2 ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in formapauperis is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint as set forth in this Order within 30 days. FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to timely file an amended complaint, this action shall be dismissed.( Response to Court due by 6/27/2011.). Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 5/27/11. (CEL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Guile v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cleora I. Guile | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
