Mullen v. Saul
| Lori J. Mullen |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| SSA Office of General Counsel |
| 2:2019cv00089 |
| December 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Stephen R Clark |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 416 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Lori J. Mullen. Defendant SSA Office of General Counsel served on 12/19/2019, answer due 2/18/2020. (Dempsey, Vicki) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by Nicholas P. Llewellyn for Defendant Andrew M. Saul. (Llewellyn, Nicholas) |
Filing 2
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the following provisions apply in this case, and will be modified only upon a showing of exceptional circumstances: This case is assigned to Track: 4. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by District Judge Stephen R. Clark on 12/17/19. (JAB)
|
| Filing 1 Social Security COMPLAINT with receipt number AMOEDC-7636009, in the amount of $400 Non-Jury Demand,Yes or No - No,, filed by Lori J Mullen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Exhibit A, #7 Exhibit B)(Dempsey, Vicki) |
| Case Opening Notification: 3 Summons(es) issued. The summons were emailed to attorney Vicki A. Dempsey. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Stephen R. Clark. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
