Bowman v. Unknown et al
| Robert M. Bowman |
| Unknown Schwak, Unknown Martin, Unknown Tulton, Unknown Nehemier, Unknown Rusty, Unknown Korte, Emily Unknown, Unknown Hansen, Unknown Dil, Unknown Duke, Unknown Cameron, Unknown Denteen, Unknown Sturm and Unknown Smith |
| 2:2025cv00002 |
| January 2, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Rodney H Holmes |
| Prisoner Petitions: Civil Detainee: Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (ECF No. #10 ) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within 45 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, Plaintiff must either pay the $405 filing fee, or file a fully-completed Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs and the certified account statement (or institutional equivalent) required by 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(2) as explained in this Memorandum and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff a copy of the Court's "Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs" form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall send Plaintiff a total of three copies of this Memorandum and Order. Plaintiff's failure to timely comply with this Memorandum and Order may result in the dismissal of this case without prejudice and without further notice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Rodney H. Holmes on 2/20/2025. (Attachments: #1 Attachment- Application to Proceed without paying fees, #2 Attachment- Memorandum & Order-copy 1, #3 Attachment- Memorandum & Order-copy 2) (HMA)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 12. copy sent to non-electronic party this date. Thu Feb 20 14:09:30 CST 2025 (HMA)
|
| Filing 11 SUPPLEMENTAL re #10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Robert M. Bowman. (CLH) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Robert M. Bowman. (HMA) |
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Robert M. Bowman. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Photos)(CLH) |
|
Filing 8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall STRIKE the following plaintiffs from this action: Thomas R. Spurlock, Bryan Smith, Christopher Couch, Reggie Martin, Darrin Grayer, Logan Fowler, Richard Follin, Jamerick Beckford, Lorenzo Ruiz Santis, Olubenga Oyesoko, Apolonio Fernandez, Terry Welch, and Charles St. Clair. Additionally, in CM/ECF, the Clerk shall edit the style of this case to reflect that Robert M. Bowman is the only plaintiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Robert M. Bowman's motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. #2 ) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within 30 days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, Robert M. Bowman shall either pay the $405 filing fee, or file a fully-completed Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs that is accompanied by a certified copy of his inmate account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to Bowman a copy of the Court's form Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Bowman's failure to timely comply will result in the dismissal of this case, without prejudice and without further notice. (Response to Court due by 3/7/2025.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Rodney H. Holmes on 2/5/2025. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Application to Proceed without paying fees)(HMA)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 8. copy sent to non-electronic party this date. Wed Feb 5 10:40:21 CST 2025 (HMA)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Change of Address by Plaintiff Robert M. Bowman. (JEB) Modified on 1/24/2025 - address updated to Fulton (ANR). |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint, by Plaintiff Charles St. Clair. (CLH) |
| Filing 5 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Terry Welch. (JEB) |
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Reggie Martin. (JEB) |
| Filing 3 SUPPLEMENTAL re #1 Complaint by Plaintiff Darrin Grayer. (JEB) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Jan 7 16:02:09 CST 2025 (admin,) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Rodney H. Holmes. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JWD) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Robert M. Bowman. (JWD) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Olubenga Oyesoko, Logan Fowler, Thomas R. Spurlock, Robert M. Bowman, Terry Welch, Darrin Grayer, Bryan Smith, Jamerick Beckford, Apolonio Fernandez, Charles St. Clair, Richard Follin, Christopher Couch, Lorenzo Ruiz Santis, Reggie Martin. (Attachments: #1 Correspondence re Inmate Account Statements, #2 Correspondence re address of plaintiff Bowman, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Envelope)(JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
