Jennings v. Groose

Jennings v. Groose

Petitioner:	Marvin Jennings
Respondent:	Michael Groose
Case Number:	4:1994cv01349
Filed:	July 12, 1994
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
Presiding Judge:	Catherine D. Perry
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 23, 2015	Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Petitioner asks me to reconsider my March 31, 2015, Memorandum and Order denying in part and dismissing in part his motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. As petitioner makes no l egal or factual arguments convincing me that my prior decision was in error, the motion to alter or amend judgment will be denied. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion to alter or amend the judgment [#31] is denied. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 04/23/2015. (CBL)
March 31, 2015	Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 28 MOTION for Relief from Judgment Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) filed by Petitioner Marvin Jennings. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) [#28] is denied in part and dismissed in part for lack of jurisdiction; the motion is denied to the extent the motion is treated as one brought under Rule 60(b)(6), and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as a second or succe ssive habeas petition in all other respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is denied as petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on March 31, 2015. (MCB)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 23, 2015

Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Petitioner asks me to reconsider my March 31, 2015, Memorandum and Order denying in part and dismissing in part his motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. As petitioner makes no l egal or factual arguments convincing me that my prior decision was in error, the motion to alter or amend judgment will be denied. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion to alter or amend the judgment [#31] is denied. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 04/23/2015. (CBL)

March 31, 2015

Filing 30 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 28 MOTION for Relief from Judgment Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) filed by Petitioner Marvin Jennings. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for relief from judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) [#28] is denied in part and dismissed in part for lack of jurisdiction; the motion is denied to the extent the motion is treated as one brought under Rule 60(b)(6), and dismissed for lack of jurisdiction as a second or succe ssive habeas petition in all other respects. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is denied as petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on March 31, 2015. (MCB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jennings v. Groose
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Marvin Jennings
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Michael Groose
Represented By:	Michael J. Spillane
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?