H.R. Bushman & Son, Corp. v. Spud Packers, Inc. et al
4:2006cv01638 |
November 13, 2006 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
Catherine D. Perry |
Agriculture Acts |
07 U.S.C. ยง 499 Agricultural Commodities Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 174 ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff H.R. Bushman & Son, Corp.'s motion to amend 171 is granted to the extent that the hearing set for 2/8/08 is cancelled. No new hearing date will be set for this issue. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any r esponse or objections to the joint motion for an order approving the partial settlement 169 must be filed no later than 2/11/08 and any reply brief must be filed no later than 2/14/08. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that responses to all other pending motio ns (other than the motions for summary judgment or judgment on the pleadings, which are governed by the 1/24/08 order), shall be filed no later than 2/11/08 and any reply brief must be filed no later than 2/14/08. Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on 2/6/08. (BAK) |
Filing 51 ORDER ESTABLISHING PACA CLAIMS PROCEDURE. Signed by Judge Catherine D. Perry on 2/14/07. (KLH, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: H.R. Bushman & Son, Corp. v. Spud Packers, Inc. et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.