Fuller v. United States of America
||Terrance E. Fuller
||United States of America
||January 10, 2007
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
||St. Louis Office
||St. Louis - City
||Charles A. Shaw
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
|Cause of Action:
||28:2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|July 10, 2013
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED movant Terrence E. Fuller's motion for relief from final judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is DENIED. [Doc. 32] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 7/10/2013. (NCL)
|April 24, 2012
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, respondent shall file a memorandum of law in response to movant's motion seeking relief from final judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if movant chooses to file a reply to respondent's response memorandum, he shall file such reply within 30 days of the date of the response. If petitioner fails to timely file his reply, the right to file a reply shall be waived. Response to Court due by 5/24/2012. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 4/24/2012. (KSM)
|February 8, 2010
JUDGMENT - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the instant Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant has not made (1) a substantial showing of the deni al of a constitutional right, such that reasonable jurists would find the Courts assessment of the constitutional claims debatable, or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further, Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S . 322, 336 (2003), or (2) a showing that reasonable jurists would find it debatable whether the Courts procedural rulings are correct, and therefore this Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000). Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 2/8/10. (KJF, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?