Rush v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Plaintiff: Shawn L. Rush
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Case Number: 4:2008cv00706
Filed: May 15, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: Civil Rights: Jobs Office
County: St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge: Charles A. Shaw
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:451 Employment Discrimination

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 26, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Norfolk Southern Railway Companys motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment is DENIED. [Doc. 6]. Signed by Honorable Charles A. Shaw on 11/26/08. (JWJ)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rush v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn L. Rush
Represented By: Ryan M. Furniss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?