Davis v. Gabrawy

Plaintiff: Jimmy Davis
Defendant: Laila G Gabrawy
Case Number: 4:2009cv00282
Filed: February 20, 2009
Court: Missouri Eastern District Court
Office: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: Rodney W. Sippel
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By: 28:1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
April 9, 2009 9 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 2 MOTION to Dismiss Party and Substitute United States of America as Defendant filed by Defendant Laila G Gabrawy, 3 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Defendant Laila G Gabrawy motion is BOTH MOTIONS GRANTED. Signed by Honorable Rodney W. Sippel on 4/9/09. (LGK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Gabrawy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jimmy Davis
Represented By: William T. Dowd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laila G Gabrawy
Represented By: Christina Bahr Moore
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.