Ariel Preferred Retail Group, LLC v. CWCapital Asset Management et al
| Ariel Preferred Retail Group, LLC |
| CWCapital Asset Management and The Woodmont Company |
| 4:2010cv00623 |
| April 13, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
MEMORANDUM OPINION re: 59 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Fred Meno, Defendant CWCapital Asset Management, Defendant The Woodmont Company. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 8/1/12. (CSG)
|
|
Filing
93
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 37 First MOTION to Compel filed by Plaintiff Ariel Preferred Retail Group, LLC, Plaintiff The Prescott Group; motion is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 5/9/12. (CSG)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM - In conclusion, the plaintiffs have failed to plead all the requisite elements of their claims for tortious interference and fraud as contained in Counts VII and IX, as well as failing to plead fraud with particularity as required by Rule 9(b) Fed.R.Civ.P. The Court further believes, upon review of the parties' pleadings, that any further amendment would not cure the deficiencies present in these particular counts. The Court will grant the defendants motion to dismiss Counts VII and IX of the plaintiffs' amended complaint. Signed by Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 9/28/11. (LAH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
