Gray v. Murray et al
| Eric J. Gray, Sr. |
| Derrick Murray, Eric Clark, Jamal Dunn, Robert McCulloch, Tanisha Ball, Mary Elizaburt, Patrick Brayer, Joan M Gilmer, Lamb Murol, Kelly Lynn, Carolyn C. Whittington, John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 4:2010cv01420 |
| August 2, 2010 |
| U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Rodney W. Sippel |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall docket this case as Eric J. Gray, Sr. v. Derrick Murray, Eric Clark, Jamal Dunn, Robert McCulloch, Tanisha Ball, Mary Elizaburt Ott, Patrick Brayer, Joan M. Gilmer, Marol Lamb, Kelly Lynn Hritz, Carolyn C. Whittington, John Doe, and Jane Doe. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue, because the complaint and supplements are legally frivolous and fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. 4] is DENIED as moot. A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order.. Signed by Honorable Rodney W. Sippel on 9/13/10. (LGK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
