Davis et al v. White
||Henry M. Davis
||Michael White and City of Ferguson, Missouri
||August 5, 2010
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
||St. Louis Office
||St. Louis - County
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Other
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 25, 2014
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: HEREBY ORDERED that John Beaird's oral motion for judgment as a matter of law is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that judgment as a matter of law is GRANTED in favor of Officer Beaird on Count II, Henry Davis' substantive du e process claim. FURTHER ORDERED that Michael White's counterclaim against Mr. Davis for battery under state law is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction. A separate Judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 03/25/2014. (CLK)
|March 10, 2014
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to unseal documents is GRANTED. [Doc. 179.] Defendant Beaird and Counterclaim Plaintiff White shall redact Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment and accompanying documents and exhibits [Docs. 124-126] pursuant to E.D.Mo. L.R. 2.17, with the exception of Exhibit M [Doc. 126-13] which shall remain under seal. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Beaird and Counterclaim Plaintiff Whites motion to seal several exhibits is GRANTED in p art and DENIED in part. [Doc. 177.]IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Beaird and Counterclaim PlaintiffWhites motion to seal several exhibits is GRANTED insofar as the Clerk of Court shall maintain Exhibit G under seal. [Doc. 177-3.] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Beaird and Counterclaim Plaintiff Whites motion to seal several exhibits is DENIED insofar as Defendant Beaird and Counterclaim Plaintiff White shall redact Exhibits D, F, and H pursuant to E.D.Mo. L.R. 2.17. [Doc. 177-1, 177-2 , and 177-4.]IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs motions to dismiss or bifurcate former Defendant Michael Whites counterclaim are DENIED. [Docs. 174, 183, 185.] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to exclude expert testimony is DENIED. [Doc. 120.] 177 185 183 120 174 179 125 124 Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 3/10/14. (CLA)
|October 22, 2010
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 8 MOTION for Costs and Attorney's Fees filed by Plaintiff Henry M. Davis motion is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Ann L. Medler on 10/22/10. (LGK)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?