Scott et al v. State of Texas et al
Lavonda D. Scott, Candies Trice and Darion McMiller |
State of Texas and Texas Department of Criminal Justice |
4:2010cv02086 |
November 1, 2010 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - City |
Stephen N. Limbaugh |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs' motions for leaveto proceed in forma pauperis [Docs. 2, 3, and 4] are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint, because the complaint is legally frivolous and fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff Lavonda Scott's motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. 8 ] and pro se motion to act as next friend of a minor [Doc. 9] are DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that "S.T., Next of Kin, Lavonda D. Scott" is STRICKEN as a party-plaintiff to this action, and the Clerk of Court shall docket this case as Lavonda D. Scott, Candies Trice, and Darion McMiller v. State of Texas and Texas Department of Criminal Justice.A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order.. Signed by Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 1/4/11. (LGK) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.