Laney v. Prudden et al
| James H. Laney |
| Doug Prudden and Christopher Koster |
| 4:2010cv02119 |
| November 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Frederick R. Buckles |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (ECF No. 1 ) is DENIED, and his claim is DISMISSED with prejudice. A separate Order of Dis missal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that because Petitioner cannot make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 834 (1998). Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 3/4/13. (TRC)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioners Second Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Pursuant to Rule 12(c), F.R.CIV.P. is DENIED. 13 Signed by Honorable Jean C. Hamilton on 3/7/12. (CLA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
