Hartstein v. United States of America
||United States of America
||December 7, 2010
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
||St. Louis Office
||St. Louis - City
||Carol E. Jackson
|Nature of Suit:
||Motions to Vacate Sentence
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 2255
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 28, 2014
MEMORANDUM - For the reasons set out above, the court concludes that motion and the files and records of this case show that Hartstein is not entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 based on any of the claims she asserts in the motion to vac ate. Therefore, the motion will be denied without a hearing. See Engelen v. United States, 68 F.3d 238, 240 (8th Cir. 1995). Additionally, the court finds that Hartstein has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Therefore, the court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. An order denying the motion will be separately filed. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 3/28/14. (KJS)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?