Ingrassia v. Sheets et al
| Thomas J. Ingrassia |
| Darren Sheets, David Leroy Easter, Gary Edward Bennett and Richard Watkins |
| 4:2011cv02033 |
| November 21, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Francois |
| Carol E. Jackson |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 26 The Court concludes that the defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendants' motion for summary judgment [Doc. # 26 ] is granted. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 6/26/13. (KKS)
|
|
Filing
5
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis[Doc. #2] is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint pursuant to the waiver agreement t he Court has with the Missouri Department of Mental Health. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendants shall reply to plaintiffs claims within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B: Prisoner Standard. Signed by Honorable Carol E. Jackson on 12/1/11. (KXS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
