Crews et al v. Monarch Fire Protection District
Michael Davis, Leslie Crews and Cary Spiegel |
Monarch Fire Protection District |
4:2012cv00142 |
January 26, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - County |
Rodney W. Sippel |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 95 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Movants' motion to reopen this case and the relief requested in the motion # 91 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Monarch Fire Protection District's counsel shallretrieve and retain all documents produced under the protective order and all deposition transcripts which have any reference to those documents that were provided to Defendants. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 1/23/14. (ARL) |
Filing 89 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' motion to reconsider # 77 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 11/18/13. (ARL) |
Filing 75 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Monarch Fire Protection District, Kim Evans, and Steve Swyers motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, for summary judgment 27 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants motion to strike 41 is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 8/6/2013. (RAK) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.