Isaiah et al v. City of Pine Lawn, Missouri et al
Milton Isaiah and Joseph Goforth |
City of Pine Lawn, Sylvester Caldwell and Ricky O. Collins |
4:2012cv00230 |
February 9, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - County |
Henry E. Autrey |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 68 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Joint Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 64] is GRANTED. 64 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 2/2/15. (CLA) |
Filing 59 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 41 , 38 ORDERED that Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment, [Doc. No's 38 and 41] are granted in part and denied in part. FURTHER ORDERED that summary judgment is granted as to Count III. FURTHER ORDERED that Counts I and II are dismissed. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs are given 14 days from the date of this order to file an Amended Complaint with respect to Counts I and II. ( Response to Court due by 8/26/2014.). Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 8/12/14. (CEL) |
Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 4 , 5 ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss [ECF No. 4] is, at this time, denied without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 5] is denied without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Autrey on 2/13/13. (CEL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.