Zasaretti-Becton v. The Habitat Company of Missouri, LL et al
| Maria Zasaretti-Becton |
| The Habitat Company of Missouri, LLC, The Habitat Company LLC, Marla Jackson and John Doe Business Entity |
| 4:2012cv00587 |
| March 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| David D. Noce |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of defendants to preclude introduction of testimony concerning certain statements made during mediation proceedings and for entry of a protective order (Doc. 41 ) is denied. IT IS FURTHER O RDERED that the joint motion of the parties to stay deadlines in the case management order pending resolution of the defendants' motion (Doc. 42 ) is sustained. Counsel shall discuss and submit to the court an proposed amended case management order not later than February 12, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 01/22/2013; (DJO)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of defendants The Habitat Company and The Habitat Company of Missouri, LLC to dismiss Counts II and III (Doc. 19) is sustained. Counts II and III of plaintiffs second amended complaint are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 6/25/2012. (KMS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
