Shahid et al v. US Bancorp
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|February 28, 2013
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 45 MOTION for Reconsideration re 44 Docket Text Order (in part) filed by Defendant Florissant, City of. Motion is denied. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on February 28, 2013. (MCB)
|August 30, 2012
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant's motion to strike [# 25 -1] is denied, and the motion for more definite statement [# 25 -2] is granted only to the following extent: plaintiffs shall file an ame nded complaint which complies with this Memorandum and Order and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure within 21 days of the date of this Order. In all other respects, the motion for more definite statement is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion to dismiss [# 21 ] is denied without prejudice as moot. ( Response to Court due by 9/20/2012.) Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 08/30/2012. (CBL)
|June 25, 2012
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs are granted leave to file a corrected copy of their amended complaint or a memorandum in compliance with this Memorandum and Order by no later than June 27, 2012. (Response to Court due by 6/27/2012.) Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on June 25, 2012. (BRP)
|June 21, 2012
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants motion to dismiss [# 6 ] is denied as moot. Signed by Honorable Catherine D. Perry on 6/21/12. (KJS)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?