Warren v. Villmer

Warren v. Villmer

Petitioner:	Wesley Warren
Respondent:	Tom Villmer
Case Number:	4:2012cv01147
Filed:	June 25, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge:	Lewis M. Blanton
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 28, 2012	Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Wesley Warren. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED. An Order of Dismissal will be filed with this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lewis M. Blanton on 9/28/12. (CSG)
August 14, 2012	Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 4] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no order to show cause shall issue at this time as to respondent, because the instant pe tition appears to be time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall show cause within thirty(30) days of the date of this Order as to why the Court should not dismiss the instant application for a writ of ha beas corpus as time-barred. Petitioner's failure to file a show cause response shall result in the denial of the instant habeas corpus petition and the dismissal of this action. ( Show Cause Response due by 9/14/2012.) Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 8/14/12. (MRS)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 28, 2012

Filing 9 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Petitioner Wesley Warren. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED. An Order of Dismissal will be filed with this Memorandum and Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lewis M. Blanton on 9/28/12. (CSG)

August 14, 2012

Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER... IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. 4] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no order to show cause shall issue at this time as to respondent, because the instant pe tition appears to be time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall show cause within thirty(30) days of the date of this Order as to why the Court should not dismiss the instant application for a writ of ha beas corpus as time-barred. Petitioner's failure to file a show cause response shall result in the denial of the instant habeas corpus petition and the dismissal of this action. ( Show Cause Response due by 9/14/2012.) Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 8/14/12. (MRS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Warren v. Villmer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Wesley Warren
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Tom Villmer
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?