Rebstock v. Russell
Richard Dale Rebstock |
Terry Russell |
4:2012cv01364 |
July 31, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Francois |
David D. Noce |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 5 ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in formapauperis [Doc. #5] is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $46.20 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. FUR THER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall docket this case as Richard Dale Rebstock v. Terry Russell, Dwain L. Forshee, Wayne County Sheriff's Department, Jon A. Kiser, Robert M. Ramshur, and State of Missouri. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk s hall not issue process or cause process to issue, because the amended complaint is legally frivolous and fails to statea claim upon which relief can be granted.A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. ( Response to Court due by 12/20/2012.). Signed by District Judge Henry E. Autrey on 11/20/12. (CEL) |
Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's form Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's form Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis Prisoner Cases. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint on the Court-provided form within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is advised that his amended complaint will take th e place of his original complaint and will be the only pleading that this Court will review. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall either pay the $350 filing fee or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. If the case is dismissed for noncompliance with this Order, the dismissal will not constitute a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Response to Court due by 9/21/2012. (Forms mailed with order); Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 08/21/2012; (DJO) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Rebstock v. Russell | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Terry Russell | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Richard Dale Rebstock | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.