Addison v. Board of Education et al
Rosalind Ann Addison |
Board of Education, Marlene E. Davis and Carol Hall-Whittier |
4:2012cv01601 |
September 4, 2012 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
St. Louis - City |
Henry E. Autrey |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 OPINION, MEMORANDUM, AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., is DISMISSED as time-barred. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent that plaint iff has any unarticulated state law discrimination or retaliation claims against defendants, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over these claims. 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). Signed by District Judge Henry E. Autrey on 1/17/13. (TRC) |
Filing 5 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for appointment ofcounsel [Doc. #4] is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, plaintiff shall show cause why her action should not be dismissed as timebarred. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, this action will be dismissed without prejudice. 4 2 ( Show Cause Response due by 10/14/2012.) Signed by District Judge Henry E. Autrey on 9/14/12. (CLA) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.