Rothman v. Johnson
Petitioner: Charles Edward Rothman
Respondent: Jean Ann Johnson
Case Number: 4:2012cv01674
Filed: September 14, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: DeKalb
Presiding Judge: David D. Noce
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Charles E. Rothman's Amended Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody 10 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that, because Petiti oner cannot make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 834 (1998). A judgment dismissing this case is filed herewith. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 9/2/14. (JWD)
December 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 17 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Defendants Motion to Return the Petition 16 is DENIED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 12/7/2012. (RAK)
October 26, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall forward to petitioner the courtprovided form for filing a "Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody" (AO Form 241) , as well as a copy of the Court's form "Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Affidavit in Support - Habeas Cases." IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, on or before November 26, 2012, petitioner shall either pay the $5 filing fee or complete and submit the form "Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Affidavit in Support - Habeas Cases." IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, on or before November 26, 2012, petitioner shall file an amended petition in accordance with the Co urt's instructions above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner fails to comply with this Order, the Court may dismiss this action without prejudice and without further notice to petitioner. (copy of order and forms sent to Charles Rothman) Response to Court due by 11/26/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge David D. Noce on 10/26/2012. (KMS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rothman v. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jean Ann Johnson
Represented By: Stephen D. Hawke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Charles Edward Rothman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?