Hazlett v. Pine Lawn, City of, et al
| Gregory Hazlett |
| Pine Lawn, City of and Steve Lowman |
| 4:2012cv01715 |
| September 24, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| John A. Ross |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Appeal Out of Time (Doc. 63 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal (Doc. 65 ) is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 5/29/15. (JWD)
|
|
Filing
61
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 52 is GRANTED. An appropriate Judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Compel 48 , Plainti ff's Request for Subpoenas of Officer Lowmans Disciplinary and Complaint Files from Various Police Departments 55 , and Plaintiff's Motion to Quash Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment 56 are DENIED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Additional Time 59 is DENIED as moot. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Defendants' Second Motion to Dismiss 45 is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 5/30/14. (JWD)
|
|
Filing
58
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the trial date of May 5, 2014 is VACATED. The Court will hold a conference with the parties after it rules on the pending motions, regarding setting a new trial date and new deadlines for the parties to file their pretrial motions, if necessary. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 4/7/14. (JWD)
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Request Pro Bono Public Service 42 is DENIED.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 11/13/13. (LGK)
|
|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts III and IV of Plaintiff's Complaint 7 is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is granted ten (10) days from the date of this Order to file an Amended Complaint.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 8/19/13. (LGK)
|
|
Filing
18
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Stay of Proceedings and Alternative Motion of Plaintiffs Attorneys to Withdraw 15 is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part. The Court denies Plaintiffs request for a stay of th is action. Plaintiffs counsels Motion to Withdraw is set for hearing on April 19, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in the undersigneds courtroom. At that time, Plaintiffs counsel must provide Plaintiffs position regarding the Motion to Withdraw. IT IS FURTHER O RDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall provide a copy of this order to Gregory Hazlett, 1538 Somerset Terrace Dr., St. Louis, MO 63136 and Gregory Hazlett, Inmate No. 48575, St. Louis County Justice Center, P.O. Box 16060, Clayton, MO 63105. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 3/26/2013. COPY OF THIS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MAILED TO GREGORY HAZLETT. (RAK)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above styled cause is randomly reassigned to the Honorable John A. Ross, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. Signed by (JGW) on 09/25/2012. (DLT)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
