Wagner v. City of Saint Louis Department of Public Safety et al
| Benjamin W. Wagner |
| Dale Glass, City of Saint Louis Department of Public Safety, Jazeall Brown, Julius Smith, Charles Bryson, Corizon - Medical, Ken McCain, Lenora Hatter, Leonard Edwards, Reginald Moore, Assistant Superintendent, T. Henderson and Janice Fairless |
| 4:2012cv01901 |
| October 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Audrey G. Fleissig |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for protective order is DENIED. (Doc. No. 65.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs October 25, 2013 motion to amend his complaint is DENIED. (Doc. No. 66.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants motion summary judgment isGRANTED. (Doc. No. 67.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs December 4, 2013 motion to amend his complaint is DENIED. (Doc. No. 72.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for direct access to Westlaw Onl ine is DENIED as moot. (Doc. No. 74.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for court order for access to phone is DENIED as moot. (Doc. No. 76.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to compel and for sanctions is DENIED. (Doc. No. 81. ) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for court order (related to law library access) is DENIED without prejudice. (Doc. No. 85.)IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs allegations regarding violation of his First Amendment rights due to the alleged withholding of his mail are DISMISSEDwithout prejudice for failure to prosecute. A separate judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 7/16/14. (JWJ)
|
|
Filing
64
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Production of Discovery is DENIED. Doc. No. 56 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Objection is DENIED. Doc. No. 57 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Moti on for Extension of time to respond to Defendant Hatters Requests for Production of Documents and Court Order for Access to Phone is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Doc. No. 60 . 1. Plaintiff is granted until Thursday, October 17, 2013, to respond to Defendant Hatters Requests for Production of Documents. 2. Plaintiffs request for an order of Court granting him telephone access is denied. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 10/9/13. (RAK)
|
|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for default judgment is DENIED. (Doc. No. 40.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. (Doc. No. 42.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for "Sanctions andRelief" is DENIED. (Doc. No. 49.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 9/11/2013. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
39
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED with respect to his request for leave to file an amended complaint, and DENIED as moot with respect o the dismissal of Fairless and Jazell. (Doc. No. 36.)IT IS FURTHER ORDERE D that Plaintiffs motion for appointment of counselis DENIED without prejudice. (Doc. No. 37.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion for access to legal books is DENIED without prejudice. (Doc. No. 37.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs request for the issuance of subpoenas is DENIED without prejudice as overbroad. (Doc. No. 38.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 5/30/13. (JWJ)
|
|
Filing
34
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for court order [#26] is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 5/1/2013. (KSH)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, no later than April 7, 2013, plaintiff shall provide the Court with addresses at which service can be effectuated on defendants Janice Fairless and Jazeall Brown. Plaintiff's failure to do so will result in a dismissal of this action against defendant Fairless and defendant Brown, without prejudice. Response to Court due by 4/7/2013. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 3/08/2013. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $26.60 within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to Clerk, United States District Court, and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to pay the initial partial filing fee within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, then this case will be dismissed without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED tha t the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendants Leonora Hatter, Jazeall Brown and Janice Fairless in their individual capacities. The Clerk shall also issue process on the City of St. Louis, Department o f Public Safety, in its official capacity. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendants Leonora Hatter, Jazeall Brown, Janice Fairless and the City of St. Louis, Department of Public Safety shall reply to pl aintiffs claims within the time providedby the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defend ants T. Henderson, Charles Bryson, Ken McCain, Corizon, Inc., Julius Smith, Reginald Moore, John Doe Assistant Superintendent, Leonard Edwards and Dale Glass because, as to these defendants, the complaint is legally frivolous or fails to state a clai m upon which relief can be granted, or both. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs claims against defendants Leonora Hatter, Jazeall Brown and Janice Fairless, in their official capacities, are also subject to dismissal, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. To the extent plaintiff brought a claim against the City of St. Louis, Department of Public Safety, in its individual capacity, this claim is also subject to dismissal for failure to state a claim. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. #4] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs request for subpoenas [Doc. #6] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B: Prisoner Standard. An appropriate Order of Partial Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order.(Response to Court due by 3/1/2013.) Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 2/1/2013. (KSM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
