Young v. United States of America
| Donald G. Young |
| United States of America |
| 4:2012cv01983 |
| October 23, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Charles A. Shaw |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's request for this Court to take judicial notice of the Supreme Court case of McQuiggin v. Perkins is GRANTED. [Doc. 7] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant's motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his motion to vacate is DENIED. [Doc. 6] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines to grant movant a Certificate of Appealability. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 7/18/2013. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct illegal sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED and DISMISSED as time barred. Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedin gs. [Doc. 1] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a Certificate of Appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253. A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 3/19/2013. (NCL)
|
|
Filing
2
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant shall show cause, in writing and no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, why the instant § 2255 motion should not be dismissed as time barred. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if movant fails to comply timely with this Order, hisSection 2255 motion will be denied and dismissed. Show Cause Response due by 3/9/2013. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 2/7/13. (JWJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Young v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Dean R. Hoag |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Donald G. Young | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
