Holmes v. Slay et al
Plaintiff: |
Michael Holmes |
Defendant: |
Francis G. Slay, Bettye Battle-Turner, Richard Gray, Jerome D. Lee, Thomas Irwin, Bobby Lee Garrett and Shell Sharp |
Case Number: |
4:2012cv02333 |
Filed: |
December 17, 2012 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Office: |
St. Louis Office |
County: |
Adair |
Presiding Judge: |
Henry E. Autrey |
Nature of Suit: |
Civil Rights: Other |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Jury Demanded By: |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
January 11, 2017 |
Filing
304
OPINNION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and for New Trial, [Doc. No. 263], is denied. 263 Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 1/11/17. (CLA)
|
March 26, 2015 |
Filing
173
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Slay, Battle-Turner, Gray, Lee and Irwin's Motion for Summary Judgment, [Doc. No. 114 ] is GRANTED.A separate judgment will be entered upon the resolution of the remaining issues herein. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 03/26/2015. (CLK)
|
March 25, 2015 |
Filing
172
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Garrett's Motion for Summary Judgment, [Doc. No. 105 ], is granted in part and denied in part;IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Sharp's Motion for Summary Judgment, [Doc. No. 108 ], is granted in part and denied in part.A separate judgment will be entered upon the resolution of the remaining issues herein. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 03/25/2015. (CLK)
|
November 7, 2013 |
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Slay, Battle-Turner, Gray, Lee and Irwin's Motion to Dismiss Counts V, VI and VII of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is GRANTED, and Counts V, VI and VII will be DISMISSED as to these defendants. [Doc. 52] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Sharp's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. [Doc. 58] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Garrett's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. [Doc. 56] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants Sharp and Garrett shall file their Answers to the Amended Complaint within the time permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Rule 12(a)(4)(A), Fed. R. Civ. P. An appropriate order of partial dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 11/7/2013. (NCL)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?