Pernod Ricard USA, LLC v. Major Brands Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Pernod Ricard USA, LLC
Defendant: Mid-Continent Distributors, Inc. and Major Brands Inc.
Counter_claimant: Major Brands Inc.
Counter_defendant: Pernod Ricard USA, LLC
Case Number: 4:2013cv00064
Filed: January 14, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: Charles A. Shaw
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 30, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 38 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs motion to bifurcate its action for declaratory judgment from Defendant Major Brands counterclaims, and to accelerate the declaratory judgment action, is GRANTED to the extent that t he claim and counterclaim for declaratory judgment shall be bifurcated from Major Brands other state law counterclaims, with the specific schedule for the case to be set in a Case Management Order that the Court shall issue after a Rule 16 scheduling conference is held in this case.(Doc. No. 27.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Rule 16 scheduling conference shall be set by separate Order. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 4/30/2013. (KSH)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pernod Ricard USA, LLC v. Major Brands Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mid-Continent Distributors, Inc.
Represented By: Paul V. Herbers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Major Brands Inc.
Represented By: Oliver H. Thomas
Represented By: Richard B. Walsh, Jr.
Represented By: R. Brad Ziegler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_claimant: Major Brands Inc.
Represented By: Oliver H. Thomas
Represented By: Richard B. Walsh, Jr.
Represented By: R. Brad Ziegler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pernod Ricard USA, LLC
Represented By: Louis S. Ederer
Represented By: Kyle P. Seelbach
Represented By: Christopher J. Valeriote
Represented By: Alan C. Veronick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter_defendant: Pernod Ricard USA, LLC
Represented By: Louis S. Ederer
Represented By: Kyle P. Seelbach
Represented By: Christopher J. Valeriote
Represented By: Alan C. Veronick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?