Kornhardt v. United States of America
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|June 8, 2016
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant James Kornhardt's motion to reconsider pursuant to Rule 59(e) is DENIED. (Doc. 29)IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant James Kornhardt's motion to schedule an evidentiary hearing and for appointment of counsel is DENIED. (Doc. 30). Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 6/8/2016. (MRC)
|March 9, 2016
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER -...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant James K. Kornhardt's motions to supplement the record are GRANTED. (Docs. 21 and 25) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant James K. Kornhardt's motion for evidentiary h earing is DENIED. (Doc. 26) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that movant James K. Kornhardt's Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that m ovant James K. Kornhardt has not made a substantialshowing of the denial of a constitutional right such that reasonable jurists would find the Courts assessment of the constitutional claims debatable, or that reasonable jurists would find it debatab le whether the Court was correct in its procedural rulings and, therefore, this Court will not issue a certificate of appealability on those claims. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 332, 338 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484-85 (2000). An appropriate judgment will accompany this Memorandum and Order.. Signed by District Judge Charles A. Shaw on 3/9/2016. (MRC)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?