Huggans v. United States of America
| Darwin Markeith Huggans |
| United States of America |
| 4:2013cv00323 |
| February 20, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Catherine D. Perry |
| Prisoner: Vacate Sentence |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Darwin Markeith Huggans motion to alter or amend judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) 54 is DENIED. An appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith given that, for the r easons set out above, Huggans has failed to present argument or evidence showing that his claim has any arguable basis either in law or fact. 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3); Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 2/9/2018. (CBL)
|
|
Filing
48
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Darwin Markeith Huggans' motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [ 47 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Huggans shall, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, either pay th e $505 appellate filing fee or file a motion in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Huggans shall file any future documents or pleadings in connection with his appeal directly with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 10/4/2016. (NEB)
|
|
Filing
44
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to alter or amend judgment and supplemental motions [23, 32], motions for discovery [24, 28], motion for appointment of counsel 29 , and all related supplements are denied. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on July 26, 2016. (MCB)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Darwin Markeith Huggans's motion to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [# 1 ] is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court will not issue a certificate of appealability, as Huggans has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a federal constitutional right. A separate Judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 06/12/2015. (CBL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Huggans v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Darwin Markeith Huggans | |
| Represented By: | Marcia G. Shein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Dean R. Hoag |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
