Vega v. Carondelet Health Network et al
| Robert Manuel Vega |
| Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Incorporated and Ascension Health |
| 4:2013cv00387 |
| March 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Henry E. Autrey |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A. |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 57 , 54 ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, [Doc. No. 57], is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, [Doc. No. 54], is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that the decision of Defendant to deny Plaintiff's claim for long term disability benefits under the Plan herein is affirmed. A separate judgment in accordance with this Opinion, Memorandum and Order is entered this same date.. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Autrey on 2/6/14. (CEL)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER: Magistrate Judge Rateau's Report and Recommendation 28 is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and conclusions of law. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 18) for Improper Venue is DENIED, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Carondelet (Doc. 18) is GRANTED, Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue (Doc. 18) to the Eastern District of Missouri is GRANTED. The Clerk's Office is directed to transfer this action to the Eastern District of Missouri forthwith. Signed by Senior Judge David C Bury on 2/28/2013. (ALS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
