Peeples v. Hurley
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|December 23, 2015
MEMORANDUM: For the reasons discussed above, the Court concludes that petitioner has failed to establish that he is entitled to relief based on state court proceedings that were contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly established f ederal law, or based upon an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceedings. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). Petitioner has also failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitut ional right. Therefore, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997). A judgment in accordance with this Memorandum will be entered separately. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 12/23/2015. (KMS)
|March 15, 2013
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER :IT ISHEREBYORDERED that the Clerk shall return petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus to him. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner must sign and return the petition to the Court no later than April 15, 2013. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner fails to comply with this Order, this action will be dismissed. (Copy of petition mailed to petitioner.) Response to Court due by 4/15/2013.. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 3/15/13. (KKS)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?