Childs v. United States of America

Childs v. United States of America

Petitioner:	Demetrius Childs
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	4:2013cv00624
Filed:	April 1, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - City
Presiding Judge:	Rodney W. Sippel
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 12, 2013	Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to formally consent, in writing, to the Court's characterization of the instant filing as § 2255 motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED t hat if movant consents to the characterization of the instant filing as § 2255 motion, then he must file an amended § 2255 motion on a Court-provided form within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if mova nt does not consent to the characterization of the instant filing as a § 2255 motion, or if movant fails to timely respond to this Order, then the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice and without characterizing the filing as a § 2255 motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to movant a copy of the Court's form motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. (COPY OF MOTION TO VACATE MAILED TO MOVANT) § 2255.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 6/12/13. (LGK)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 12, 2013

Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that movant shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to formally consent, in writing, to the Court's characterization of the instant filing as § 2255 motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED t hat if movant consents to the characterization of the instant filing as § 2255 motion, then he must file an amended § 2255 motion on a Court-provided form within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if mova nt does not consent to the characterization of the instant filing as a § 2255 motion, or if movant fails to timely respond to this Order, then the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice and without characterizing the filing as a § 2255 motion. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to movant a copy of the Court's form motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence under 28 U.S.C. (COPY OF MOTION TO VACATE MAILED TO MOVANT) § 2255.. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 6/12/13. (LGK)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Childs v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By:	Michael A. Reilly
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Demetrius Childs
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?