Wilkins v. Anadarko Industries, L.L.C.

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Missouri Eastern District Wilkins v. Anadarko Industries, L.L.C.

Wilkins v. Anadarko Industries, L.L.C.

Plaintiff:	Rayburn Wilkins, Jr.
Defendant:	Anadarko Industries, L.L.C.
Case Number:	4:2013cv00908
Filed:	May 13, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge:	Carol E. Jackson
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 20, 2013	Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants motion to enforce settlement agreement [Doc. # 19] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall have until September 27, 2013 to (1) execute a release of all claims against the de fendant and (2) execute and file a stipulation for dismissal of this action with prejudice. If plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the Court will dismiss this action with prejudice and without further notice to plaintiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDER ED that upon plaintiffs execution of the release and stipulation for dismissal, the defendant shall pay to plaintiff the agreed- upon settlement amount. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall have until October 4, 2013, to submit a verified statement of attorneys fees and costs incurred in bringing the motion to enforce settlement. ( Dismissal Paper(s) due by 9/27/2013, Response to Court due by 10/4/2013.). Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 9/20/2013. (KMS)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 20, 2013

Filing 23 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants motion to enforce settlement agreement [Doc. # 19] is granted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall have until September 27, 2013 to (1) execute a release of all claims against the de fendant and (2) execute and file a stipulation for dismissal of this action with prejudice. If plaintiff fails to comply with this order, the Court will dismiss this action with prejudice and without further notice to plaintiff. IT IS FURTHER ORDER ED that upon plaintiffs execution of the release and stipulation for dismissal, the defendant shall pay to plaintiff the agreed- upon settlement amount. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant shall have until October 4, 2013, to submit a verified statement of attorneys fees and costs incurred in bringing the motion to enforce settlement. ( Dismissal Paper(s) due by 9/27/2013, Response to Court due by 10/4/2013.). Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 9/20/2013. (KMS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilkins v. Anadarko Industries, L.L.C.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Anadarko Industries, L.L.C.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rayburn Wilkins, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?