Castellano et al v. Schnucks Markets, Inc.
| Curtis Barnard, Michael Castellano, Doris Curry, Amy Maylord and Anita Ohren |
| Schnucks Markets, Inc. |
| 4:2013cv01201 |
| June 25, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| John A Ross |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: In accordance with the Memorandum and Order entered this day and incorporated herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 6/19/15. (ARL)
|
|
Filing 12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file this order in both the MDL master docket and the individual case docket and term the Plaintiffs' Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss filed in both dockets. A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order to be filed in the individual action. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 6/19/15. Associated Case: 4:13-cv-01201-JAR(ARL)
|
| Filing 11 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #10 MOTION to Dismiss Case Without Prejudice filed by Plaintiffs Curtis Barnard, Michael Castellano, Doris Curry, Amy Maylord, Anita Ohren. (Quinn, Christopher) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss Case Without Prejudice by Plaintiffs Curtis Barnard, Michael Castellano, Doris Curry, Amy Maylord, Anita Ohren. Associated Cases: 4:13-md-02470-JAR, 4:13-cv-01201-JAR(Quinn, Christopher) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, to the extent that some plaintiffs and the defendant request a stay of this action, the request for a stay is denied, in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file an amended joint scheduling plan no later than Friday, December 13, 2013, to establish a schedule for limited discovery on matters discussed at the conference and set forth on the Court record. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that James Smith of Bock and Hatch, LLC is appointed as interim liaison counsel.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 12/6/13. Associated Cases: 4:13-md-02470-JAR et al.(LGK)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: The Court previously set a scheduling conference in the above case for Friday, 12/6/13 at 10:00 a.m. For the convenience of counsel, they may participate in the scheduling conference via telephone. If they choose to participate by telephone, counsel shall notify chambers no later than Thursday, 12/5/13.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 12/3/13. Associated Cases: 4:13-md-02470-JAR et al.(LGK)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: This matter is before the Court on the Defendant Schnuck Market Inc.'s Unopposed Motion to Consolidate (ECF No. 44 ). The Motion 44 is GRANTED.IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Castellano v. Schnuck Markets, Inc., Case No. 4:13-CV-1201 will be consolidated into the pending multi-district litigation In Re: Schnuck Markets, Inc., Customer Data Security Breach Litigation, 4:13-md-2470-JAR. All filings should be made in the 4:13-md-2470-JAR case. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 11/26/13. Associated Cases: 4:13-md-02470-JAR, 4:13-cv-00683-JAR, 4:13-cv-01201-JAR(ARL)
|
|
Filing 6
Docket Text ORDER: Re: # 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re # 4 Notice of Filing Motion to Consolidate, # 1 Complaint, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Class Action Complaint Until After Ruling on Pending Consolidation and MDL Motions by Defendant Schnucks Markets, Inc.. (Hormuth, Kevin) filed by Schnucks Markets, Inc. ; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Rodney W. Sippel on 7/16/13. (ARL)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re # 4 Notice of Filing Motion to Consolidate, # 1 Complaint, Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Class Action Complaint Until After Ruling on Pending Consolidation and MDL Motions by Defendant Schnucks Markets, Inc.. (Hormuth, Kevin) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing of Motion to consolidated by Defendant Schnucks Markets, Inc. with case number 13-CV-683 JAR (Attachments: # 1 Attachment Domiano - Motion to Consolidate, # 2 Attachment Domiano - Brief in Support of Motion to Consolidate)(Karlsgodt, Paul) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by Amy Maylord, Curtis Barnard, Anita Ohren, Michael Castellano, Doris Curry on Schnucks Markets, Inc. on 6/27/13; answer due 7/18/13. (Driscoll, John) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiffs Curtis Barnard, Michael Castellano, Doris Curry, Amy Maylord, Anita Ohren Process Server: At Your Service Process Service (Attachments: # 1 Summons)(Driscoll, John) |
| Case Opening Notification Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Rodney W. Sippel. {Service NOT issued, Plaintiffs attorney did not attach service documents. Notified to file service documents in case.} (SAJ) |
| Summons 1 @ 21 days Issued as to defendant Schnucks Markets, Inc.. The summons was emailed to john@thedriscollfirm.com, nikki@thedriscollfirm.com. (SAJ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Plaintiffs Jury Demand,, filed by Amy Maylord, Curtis Barnard, Anita Ohren, Michael Castellano, Doris Curry.(Driscoll, John) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/26/2013: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Original Filing Form) (SAJ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
