Braxton et al v. DKMZ Trucking, Inc. et al.
| Hattie Braxton |
| DKMZ Trucking Inc., Fedex Ground Package System Inc. and Kent Bivens |
| 4:2013cv01335 |
| July 12, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - County |
| Jean C. Hamilton |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
89
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Joint Motion to Bar Testimony and Opinions of Plaintiffs Neuropsychologist, Thomas Martin, (ECF No. 69), is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Hattie Braxtons Motion to Exclude Exper t Testimony and Opinions of C. Brian Tanner, P.E., (ECF No. 68), is GRANTED IN PART, and Tanner will not be permitted to testify as to the specific medical causation of Braxtons injuries. 69 68 Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 2/13/15. (CLA)
|
|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss Count II is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss Count III is GRANTED, and Count III of Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Defendants Motion to Dismiss Count IV is GRANTED, and Count IV of Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED. 19 22 24 Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 12/16/13. (CLA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
