Brown v. Russell
| Deraughn Brown |
| Terry Russell |
| 4:2013cv01515 |
| August 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Francois |
| John A. Ross |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Deraughn Browns Amended Application for a COA (Doc. 95 ) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 8/13/18. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
88
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Deraughn Browns Application for a COA (Doc. 87 ) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 5/29/18. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
79
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Deraughn Brown's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Entry of Final Resolution (Doc. 72 ), is DENIED as moot. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 4/30/2018. (CLO)
|
|
Filing
41
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Leave to Appeal in Forma Pauperis (Doc. 40 ) is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 10/28/2016. (CLO)
|
|
Filing
37
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Deraughn Browns Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, because Petitioner cannot make a substantial showin g of the denial of a constitutional right, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997). A judgment dismissing this case is filed herewith. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 9/30/16. (JAB)
|
|
Filing
20
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Deraughn Brown's Motion Requesting Permission to Submit Supplement Reply Brief (Doc. 17 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's motion entitled "Consideration of Evidentiary Hearing" (Doc. 18 ) is DENIED, without prejudice.. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 10/2/15. (KKS)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 14 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Quash Stay-And-Abeyance Procedure (Doc. 14 ) is GRANTED. Petitioners Motion entitled, Stay-And-Abeyance Procedure (Doc. 13 ) is hereby withdrawn. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 5/6/15. (ARL)
|
|
Filing
12
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing (Doc. 11 ) is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 3/27/15. (ARL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. Russell | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Deraughn Brown | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Terry Russell | |
| Represented By: | Stephen D. Hawke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
