Phillips v. Hurley et al
Plaintiff: Roy Phillips
Defendant: James Hurley, Janet Wilson, Marsha Kiel, Amber Grote, Donna Kearse, Dana Jost, Unknown Hagerty and John Does
Case Number: 4:2013cv01745
Filed: September 5, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: Pike
Presiding Judge: Stephen N. Limbaugh
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 141 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 78 First MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Larry Allen, Defendant Kristin Cutt, Defendant James Hurley, Defendant Amber Grote, Defendant Tyree Butler, Marsha Kiel. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that def endants' motion for summary judgment (#78) is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER HEREBY ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of defendants and against plaintiff. A separate judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 8/18/16. (CSG)
May 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 60 MOTION for Reconsideration re 59 Memorandum & Order, MOTION to Dismiss Case Without Prejudice filed by Plaintiff Roy Phillips; motion is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 5/20/15. (CSG)
March 24, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 59 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 50 MOTION to Set Aside Order/Judgment of Interlocutory Partial Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Roy Phillips, 52 MOTION to Amend/Correct 9 Amended Complaint, filed by Plaintiff Roy Phillip s, 51 MOTION to Add Party filed by Plaintiff Roy Phillips. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the plaintiff's motion to set aside partial summary judgment (ECF # 50) is GRANTED as set forth herein.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to add party defendants (ECF #51) is DENIED. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to amend the first amended complaint (ECF #52) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth herein. The motion is GRANTED only to the extent that plaintiff is granted leave to add a claim of injunctive relief against defendant Hurley on the claim in the first amended complaint for failure to replace broken eye glasses. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED. The filing of the proposed second amended complaint is DENIED. Plaintiff may file a second amended complaint that is consistent with the Court's prior orders and this memorandum and order within seven days. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 3/24/15. (CSG)
September 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 19 MOTION to Dismiss Party filed by Defendant James Hurley, Defendant Amber Grote, Defendant John Hagerty, Defendant Marsha Kiel, 17 MOTION to Dismiss Party filed by Defendant Larry Allen, Defen dant Kristin Cutt, Defendant James Hurley, Defendant Tyree Butler, 18 MOTION to Dismiss Party filed by Defendant James Hurley. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion of defendants Hurley, Butler, Cutt, and Allen (ECF # 17) is GRANTED a s set forth herein and judgment is entered in favor of defendants as to Count I of plaintiff's amended complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Hurley's motion to dismiss Count II of the amended complaint (ECF #18) is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part as set forth herein. The motion is GRANTED only to the extent plaintiff alleges violations of the Missouri constitution as a basis for his § 1983 claim. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss of defendants Kiel, Gro te, Hagerty, and Hurley (ECF #19) as to Count III of the amended complaint is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part. The motion is DENIED as to defendants Kiel, Grote, and Hurley and GRANTED as to defendant Hagerty. Further, the motion is GRANTED to the extent plaintiff alleges violations of the Missouri constitution as a basis for his § 1983 claim. As the sole claim against defendant Hagerty is alleged in Count III of the amended complaint, plaintiff's claim against defendant Hagerty is DISMISSED. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 9/9/14. (CSG)
September 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Janet Wilson, Marsha Kiel, Amber Grote, Donna Kearse, Dana Jost, and Unknown Hagerty are DISMISSED without prejudice, because they are not properly joined in this action under Rule 20(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, as to the John Doe defendants and Warden James Hurley, the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint, because the allegations are legally frivolous and fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall docket this case as Roy Phillips v. James Hurley, John Does ("unknown committee members and other staff" at NECC), Janet Wilson, Marsha Kiel, Amber Grote, Donna Kearse, Dana Jost, and Unknown Hagerty. A separate Order of Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 9/25/13. (CSG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Phillips v. Hurley et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Roy Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: James Hurley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Janet Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marsha Kiel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amber Grote
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donna Kearse
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dana Jost
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unknown Hagerty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?