Wood v. Robert Bosch Tool Corporation
| Donald Wood |
| Robert Bosch Tool Corporation |
| 4:2013cv01888 |
| September 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| Maries |
| Thomas C. Mummert |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
248
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's fourth motion to seal requesting that unredacted trial transcripts be sealed [ECF No. 243] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all of Defendant's designations, construed as motions, for sealing of materials [ECF Nos. 216, 238, and 242] are GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia L. Cohen on November 30, 2016. (MCB)
|
|
Filing
230
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for bill of costs [Doc. 223] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as set forth above. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall tax the following costs in favor of Plaintiff. Fees of the Clerk $ 700.00; Fees for printed or electronically recorded transcripts $ 2,743.55; Fees and disbursements for printing $ 4,800.20; Fees for witnesses $ 2,276.71; Fees for exemplification and copies $ 1,200.76; Other costs $ 519.50;Total Taxable Costs $12,237.72 Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on December 2, 2015. (MCB)
|
|
Filing
116
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (See Full Order.) Having considered the available record, in light of the principles applicable to consideration of a motion for summary judgment, the Court will deny Defendant's motion. Genuine disputes of material facts exist regarding design defect and causation; and Defendant is not entitled to entry of summary judgment in its favor as a matter of law. Accordingly, after careful consideration, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment [Doc. 79 ] is DENIED as moot with respect to any claim by Plaintiff of manufacturing defect and as to any proof by circumstantial evidence, due to Plaintiff's concession that he is not pursuing such a claim or that type of proof in this lawsu it. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant's motion for summary judgment [Doc. 79 ] is otherwise DENIED. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that Defendant's request for oral argument on its motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on 9/24/2015. (CBL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wood v. Robert Bosch Tool Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Donald Wood | |
| Represented By: | Shawn G. Foster |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Robert Bosch Tool Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
