Carr v. Colvin
||Carolyn W. Colvin
||January 24, 2014
||Missouri Eastern District Court
||St. Louis Office
||St. Louis - County
||Nannette A. Baker
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|November 19, 2014
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the relief which Carr seeks in her Complaint and Brief in Support of Plaintiffs Complaint is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. [Docs. 1 , 13 .] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Commissioners decisio n of December 11, 2012 is REVERSED and REMANDED for a new RFC determination, new vocational expert testimony, and evaluation of the medical opinion evidence in accordance with 20 C.F.R. § 404.1527(c). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Judgment of Rev ersal and Remand will be filed contemporaneously with this Memorandum and Order remanding this case to the Commissioner of Social Security for further consideration pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence 4. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 11/19/14. (KJS)
|February 24, 2015
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Application for Attorneys Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act is GRANTED. [Doc. 24.]IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Commissioner of Social Security shallremit to the Parmele Law Firm attorneys fees in the amount of $5,059.75, subject to any preexisting debt that the Plaintiff owes the United States. 24 Signed by Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker on 2/24/15. (CLA)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.